Terence Atmane vs Mattia Bellucci Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining second serve performance over the past six months, Terence Atmane has won 43.55% of their second serve points, compared to Mattia Bellucci, who has won 48.06%. How does this impact the match outcome? This could give Bellucci a slight edge in maintaining serve games.
• In terms of return game performance, Atmane has a stronger recent form, winning 46.25% of opponents' second serve points while Bellucci manages 43.65%. Atmane also shows strength in first serve returns with 20.96% compared to Bellucci's 25.10%.
• Both players face breakpoints with Atmane saving 59.26% and Bellucci saving 53.94%, indicating Atmane's better pressure management.
• A yearly match performance comparison reveals Terence Atmane winning 52.31% of his matches, surpassing Mattia Bellucci's 43.64% win rate.
• Both players excel on hard surfaces, winning 65% of their matches, but Atmane falters on grass and Bellucci on indoor hard.
• When considering player level, Atmane has been successful in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 61.29%, whereas Bellucci performs slightly better in main tour events with a 51.85% win rate.
• Their direct head-to-head record favors Atmane, who leads 1-0, having won their only meeting at the Australian Open on hard courts.
• Interestingly, Atmane has faced opponents with an average rank of 205.14, while Bellucci has played against those ranking 142.38. Does this experience edge favor Bellucci?
• In deciding set scenarios, Atmane has a 50% success rate compared to Bellucci's 33% over the last year, suggesting Atmane's resilience in tight matches.

Editorial Prediction (December 22, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Terence Atmane and Mattia Bellucci promises to be exciting given their contrasting strengths and performance trends.

While Bellucci demonstrates greater second serve efficiency and has faced higher-ranked opponents, Atmane has a superior return game and better breakpoint success, highlighting his strategic resilience.

Historically, Atmane leads their direct encounters solidly and has performed admirably in pressure situations, which could be crucial in deciding the match's outcome.

Considering these aspects, Terence Atmane is favored to win the match, given his advantageous head-to-head record and overall performance durability.